Secret compartments in cars
![secret compartments in cars secret compartments in cars](https://i.pinimg.com/736x/42/11/74/4211741d1d013635b12fdf50114f8424.jpg)
I'm not really clear on what "underhanded tactics" you have in mind the ones I know well are practiced generally by law enforcement and public prosecutors, who necessarily hold most of the cards, and they do it for bench trials too.īut again, I think it's important to emphasize that the jury trial is an option for a defendant in a criminal case. But I'd rather a hundred guilty men go free because of their showboating lawyers than one innocent man go to prison. Yes, I suppose if you're worried about Law and Order and the Public Peace, it's easier to just route everyone into a system that effectively mirrors the American plea bargaining system. Certainly the system is set up to be adversarial (though it generally isn't so much in practice), but for the most part, that benefits defendants. This is the case on legal dramas and very high profile cases, perhaps, but certainly not the vast majority of cases that actually go to trial - there is no interested audience that cares for most cases. It very much follows the American model of "win at all costs." Underhanded and unfair tactics, rather than receiving criticism, are honored and celebrated. Lawyers are gauged based on their ability to win cases rather than their ability to practice law well. > What I've found is that jury systems tend to favor the "competition" model of justice, where prosecution and defense are locked in combat, with the judge as referee. "Years of training in law and justice", in my experience, has the tendency of engendering in people a belief that they are better, wiser, and more right than anyone else. On top of that, appointed legal "expert" judges often do not deserve the respect you're according them.
![secret compartments in cars secret compartments in cars](https://i.pinimg.com/originals/b2/58/1e/b2581eb60336a3fadaa15970ea65d6bf.png)
![secret compartments in cars secret compartments in cars](https://i.pinimg.com/originals/67/00/f6/6700f61ce2e40be4eeeec41f2249dc0a.jpg)
This is a complicated issue, but having seen firsthand how far the legal interpretation of the law drifts (because of the insularity of the legal community) from the popular sentiment that drives legislation, I'm strongly for some judges being elected. Judges are not always elected - it depends on the jurisdiction and type of judge. If you think your case isn't likely to win anyone over, but that you can get off based on legal technicalities, you want a bench trial. If you think that your fellow citizens would sympathize with your plight, maybe even exercise jury nullification, you want a jury trial. The state actually prefers for people to have bench trials because jury trials are more complicated and expensive. They could have chosen to have a bench trial with only a judge. When someone has a jury trial, it's because they elected to exercise their right to do so. In the US, you can waive your right to a jury trial. He's not the linchpin of the drug trade the prosecution made him out to be, but he does not appear to be quite the innocent bystander Wired makes him out to be either. The appeals court mentions an intercepted call where Anaya told the drug traders he could put "3 speakers" in a Camry for $2,500, where "3 speakers" meant a compartment to hold 3 kilos. It's probably a bad idea to do business with people who want to use code words when they talk to you on the phone. He's basically arguing that to "knowingly" join a conspiracy, you have to know its objectives and scope, and he says he lacked that knowledge. He just didn't know what particular illegal use they were going to be put to. Something is mentioned there that either was not mentioned in the Wired article or I missed it: Anaya admits that he knew particular customers were buying compartments for illegal purposes. The compartment is now concealed and can be used to store valuables out of sight.(Repeat of comment from discussion almost four years ago, with minor spelling and style edits): This will create a space under the plywood where you can store things. Place four legs (or something to raise the board off of the ground) under the plywood.This will help to conceal the plywood and make it look like it belongs in the car. Cover the plywood with carpet that matches the interior of your SUV.Cut the plywood to match the dimensions of the floor in your SUV trunk.You will need to know the dimensions so that you can cut the plywood to size. The first step is to measure the floor of the trunk in your SUV.Steps to Create a Concealed Compartment in SUV, Van, or Hatchback Whatever the reason, making a hidden compartment in your car can be a good way to keep your things safe and out of sight. Maybe they have a lot of money or something else that they don’t want other people to know about. Some people might want to make a hidden compartment in their car because they don’t want other people to see what they have in their car.